Skip to content

Tree

Verified?: Yes
Status: Alive
Reason for Archiving:
Family: Myrtaceae
Genus: Corymbia
Genus & Species: Corymbia tessellaris
Common Name: Moreton Bay Ash
Age Class: Mature
Is this a Tree Of Significance (TOS)?: Yes
Reason for TOS status: Exceptional Tree - Community
IUCN Category:
Tree Height (Estimated) [m]: 18
Crown Base (m): 5
Crown Width (NS) [m]: 10
Crown Width (EW) [m]: 14
Diameter at Standard Height (DSH) [cm] @ 1.4m: 54
Diameter at Root Flare (DRF) [cm]: 60
Condition (General): Good
Condition (Leaf): Good
Code: COTE1
Height Range: 10-20 Metres
DSH [inches]: 21.259854
DSH Range: 46-60cm
Number of Stems: 1
Observations: Deadwood - Minor
Lean angle (Off Vertical):
Infection/disease:
Fungi Layer Primary ID:
Insect Infestation:
Birds:
Protected plants in tree:
Breeding Animals:
Tree Comments: Light infestation of mistletoe.
Archived: No
Has Ecobenefits: Yes

Location

Tree Number: 1
Organization: Cairns
Divisional Boundary: (6) Cr Kristy Vallely
Council Managed: True
Suburb: STRATFORD
Address: 2-4 Rinks Close
Address Number: 2-4
Address Street: Rinks Close
Street the tree is on?:
Management Area: Central District
Park Name:
Longitude: 145.73403691485
Latitude: -16.874757367069
Land Use: Park / Vacant / Other
Location on Site: Park/Reserve
Building Direction (Compass Degrees): 290
Building Distance (m): 21

Management

CRM #: 1132971
Inspected?:
CRM 2::
Tree Work: Prune - Deadwooding
Work Priority: Maintenance Cycle (Planned Maintenance Cycle)
Maintenance Comments:
Last Inspection:
User: P.Taylor
Last Modified User: L.Kerridge
Last Modified: 04/23/2026
Date Added: 06/28/2020
Next Inspection:
Inspection Cycle:
Clearance Confilicts:
Wires: Present / No Conflict

Risk Assessment

Assessed Tree Part: Whole Tree
Likelihood of Failure: Improbable
Likelihood of Impacting Target: Very Low
Likelihood: Unlikely
Consequence of Failure: Significant
Risk Rating: Low

Construction

Average Canopy Spread [m]: 12
Notional Root Zone (NRZ) [m]: 6.48
Structural Root Zone (SRZ) [m]: 2.6703666836144833
TPZ (NRZ +) (m):
Planned/design encroachment:
% Allowed encroachment:
TPZ Notes:
Impact on infrastructure:
To Be Removed: No
TPZ Plan Attachment:

Planting

Useful Life Expectancy (ULE): 40+ years
Crown Light Exposure (CLE): Full Light top & 3 sides
Crown Missing (%): 0
Percent Dieback (%): 0

Appraisal

Base Value: 24341.76
Species Factor:
Species Adjustment:
Final Species Factor:
Aesthetics Factor:
Locality Factor:
Trunk Condition:
Growth Condition:
Structure Condition:
Pests & Diseases Condition:
Canopy Development Condition:
Life Expectancy Condition:
Condition Factor:
Total Tree Value:
Stump Grinding Cost:
Chipper Cost:
Tower Cost:
Replacement Tree Cost:
Total Tree, Removal & Replacement:

TRRA

D - Is the tree dangerous?:
Can the danger be mitigated or isolated?:
N - Is the tree an excessive nuisance?:
M - Is it good management practice to remove the tree?:
C - Is the tree located where construction or excavation activi:
Can remedial work be done to solve the issue?:
Comments/notes:

Claims

Vegetation Ownership:
Was Council responsible for planting this/these tree/s?:
Who Planted the tree (If known):
If known, when was it planted?:
Date of Failure (If known):
Type of Failure:
Reason for Failure:
Was Council aware of issues with the tree or trees within this:
Was there a history of tree failure in the vicinity of the tree:
If yes, please describe the history of failures and/or action t:
Was the work undertaken by contractor?:
Who was the contractor and when did it take place?:
If so, provide CRM #s :
Does the tree form part of a regular inspection program?:
If Yes, when was the last inspection undertaken?:
What was the outcome of the last inspection?:
Is it a high traffic area?:
Is the area inspected regularly?:
Is it reasonable that Council would know/should have known that:
Is it reasonable that Council should have taken further action,:
Has damage occurred?:
Describe damage (What, why, how, size of failed part, etc.):
Is this species normally planted by Council?:
If not, why?:
Type of location:
System of inspection for this tree/s:
Has Council received any complaints about this tree/s prior to :
Previous actions taken:
If nearby removals or other, please describe:
Is there any other information relevant to the failure and/or d:

Coconuts

Coconut Palm Selector: Remove & Replace

Photos

Street View

Map

Eco-Benefits

Overall Monetary Benefit: $2.11
Stormwater Monetary Benefit: $0.70
Runoff Avoided: 10.42 (ft³)
Interception: 184.78 (ft³)
Air Quality Monetary Benefit: $0.98
Pollutants Removed: 1.41 (lbs)
Carbon Monetary Benefit: $0.44
Carbon Storage: 4696.21 (lbs)
CO₂ Storage: 17219.43 (lbs)
CO₂ Sequestered: 7.38 (lbs)

Most Recent Changes to this Tree

L.Kerridge set CRM #="1132971" on Apr 23, 2026 at 1:30pm
P.Taylor set Coconut Palm Selector="Remove & Replace " on Dec 13, 2022 at 2:36pm
P.Taylor set Location on Site="Park/Reserve" on Sep 22, 2020 at 8:52am
P.Taylor set Inspected?="" on Sep 21, 2020 at 11:04am
user1 set Verified?="Yes" on Sep 11, 2020 at 7:47am
P.Taylor set Birds="" on Jun 29, 2020 at 10:53am
P.Taylor set Tree Comments="Light infestation of mistletoe." on Jun 29, 2020 at 10:52am
P.Taylor set Crown Width (EW) [m]="14" on Jun 29, 2020 at 10:51am
P.Taylor set Crown Width (NS) [m]="10" on Jun 29, 2020 at 10:51am
P.Taylor set Diameter at Root Flare (DRF) [cm]="60" on Jun 29, 2020 at 10:51am

Work Records, Work History

WR ID Work Category Work Task WR Status Assigned To Common Name DSH Address Date Created Archived
29035 Prune - Deadwood Moreton Bay Ash 21 2-4 Rinks Close 05/10/2024 No
41143 Prune - Deadwood Moreton Bay Ash 21 2-4 Rinks Close 04/23/2026 No

Tree Inspections

No results
Report Prepared: June 7, 2026